Nathan Andrew Fain on Tue, 11 Oct 2016 22:45:27 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> does decentralisation obfuscate accountability? |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 With the next Moneylab in Amsterdam around the corner I thought to share the video from a lecture performance at Hebbel-am-Ufer Berlin that tried to stage a critical take on the value of decentralisation. Nearly a year after the show myself and co-author Maria Rössler are still wondering what the democratic value of decentralisation technologies is. It is becoming harder to see a distinction between decentralisationist and the more antiquated Randian deregulationists. The end result of either seems to be the obfuscation of responsibility. "Right is the Might of the Community" is intended as a perversion of the utopic ideas of Bitcoin, DOA's and decentralised power. One upset audience member described it as "it felt like the Internet was speaking at me". Not shown in the video are the Bitcoin paper wallets with 1€ on each that are given to the audience at the entrance. http://vimeo.com/cyphunk/rightofmight password: upandover Short excerpt from the concept and research paper for the performance: <quote> A technologist presents studies and graphs in front of an audience. He explains the relationships between inflation, the central bank, growth, competition, the psychological dispositions of human actors and the end of the planet. This man embodies a highly optimistic notion of a technological determinism which has become known as „Californian Ideology“. He understands the potential of the new technologies, the virtues of the algorithms, the subversive qualities of Bitcoin. Driven by radical individualism and a general mistrust towards authoritarian structures, he believes that our society can be improved, social inequalities can be overcome and power can be decentralized with the help of computerized processes. Convinced of the potential of automated collective consensus (the Might of the Community) he pursues a tech-utopian form of absolute democracy in which society is organized in a non-hierarchical bazaar-like structure. processes. Convinced of the potential of automated collective consensus (the Might of the Community) he pursues a tech-utopian form of absolute democracy in which society is organized in a non-hierarchical bazaar-like structure. In constructing the protagonist’s argumentation, we used the sense of control that technology alluringly promises its users, dressing-up neoliberal principles in the language of democratic empowerment. The character convincingly distils ecological and social problems as political consequences of economic power. As an alternative to the monopoly of centralized currencies, the protagonist introduces a digital currency that is based on a computer algorithm and that does not seem to be susceptible to the human craving for growth or the social dominance of the social group of white heterosexual men. </quote> peace -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlfvuN0ACgkQveagdEkPM4D2NACg5rHWQUk3ST+Yr8QzooiG2p1q TpIAn3x6i1oyuExq0A7jaNm4v13EfqhR =cfzY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: