| William Waites on Wed, 21 May 2014 19:50:26 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| <nettime> Surveillance in Scotland -- More of the Same |
Surveillance in Scotland -- More of the Same
--------------------------------------------
Edinburgh, May 2014
There is a petition [1] in front of the Scottish Parliament to
conditionally grant Edward Snowden asylum should Scotland become
independent. This presented an interesting opportunity yesterday for
the parliament -- or individual politicians -- to take a position on
what is probably the most significant issue of this generation: the
transformation of society through ubiquitous surveillance. This topic
has been conspicuous by its absence from the independence debate so
far and the parliament missed its chance.
Several of the MSPs on the committee were sympathetic to the idea, but
the discussion soon degenerated into the technicalities of extradition
and missed the point. They chose to focus on the Scottish Government
Whitepaper says that it intends to maintain current extradition
arrangements [2] and so the actual taking up of an asylum offer might
be unlikely, and in any case would have to wait until 2016. The point
that the gesture itself would be significant was largely ignored.
What could be the reason for this? The whitepaper also says that the
organisation of the security and intelligence services will be
primarily done with guidance from the UK. Given the level of overreach
and probable illegality [3] that has been engaged in by the UK, this
is a poor model for an independent Scotland to copy.
If one were feeling cynical and disillusioned with politicians, it
almost seems as though the apparently sympathetic words by some of the
committee members may have been designed to create the impression of
responsiveness to a petitioner who brought a serious public grievance
before them, along with something concrete that they could do about it
whilst doing nothing about it.
There was never any intention of doing anything about it because --
and I hope that I am wrong about this -- one thing that both the
Scottish and the UK governments agree upon is that the citizens of
Scotland will remain under constant surveillance no matter the outcome
of the vote on September 18th.
[1] http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/GettingInvolved/Petitions/asyluminscotlandforedwardsnowden
[2] http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2013/11/9348/11
[3] http://kingsreview.co.uk/magazine/blog/2014/05/21/2014-the-return-of-big-brother/
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org