jhopkins on Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:50:52 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> the fluidity of leaking |
a short meditation on leaking... http://tech-no-mad.net/blog/archives/4403 and following: the fluidity of leaking What could better illustrate the instability of protocol-driven social control systems than the phenomenon of a leak? Springing a leak is an irruption through a human-constructed wall (hull) holding back the chaotic flows of the sea. Wikileaks is a reversal of that, where the leak is from the inside of the ship-of-State to the outside. Where inside there are protocol-defined pathways of State-driven communication flow filling a space of partially-stabilized human endeavor. Every so often, one of the nodes of State communication goes rogue, mad, AWOL, counter, and defies the standing protocols by whatever means possible. Opening the mouth and speaking, telling the secrets of State, a yawning vomit of bilge over the sides: merely seasick. The hull of the ship of State exists across a multi-dimensional space of refined/defined energy flow. Defined energy flow resists change and promotes continuance. Regarding the State, protocol controls individual behavior through internalized patterns of embodied thought. The State seeks any possible way to apply these internal protocols, and is successful if those ways promote the existence of the necessary flow pathways that insure the continuance of the structure of the State. The more rigid the expectations of the State, the more necessary the adherence to prescribed protocols (and vice versa). The State also applies controls to patterns of energy flow external to the body. These two (internal and external) sets of controls are not separate but rather are united in the space of flow to effect more-or-less total control on the participant and the crew of the ship of State. A protocol irruption necessarily introduces instability into the situation. Any rigid ship of State can only manage a certain level of leakage. If the inefficiency of protocol is such that the energy necessary to insure control of energy sources (that the State depends upon to sustain itself) is not available, the State will gradually collapse, shrink (in areal or numeric) extent, increase its level of disorder, dissolve into an indeterminate constellation of sub-systems, or simply sink. These sub-systems, life-rafts may temporarily increase in number to the actual number of individual humans in the system, but will quickly re-configure, moving through the familial, tribal, clan, and perhaps higher protocollary allegiance levels based on historical precedence and the need to survive and procreate. The non-elite, the stowage: the old and infirm (past breeding age), the poor, the young, the sick, the weak are always dreck in such precarious transitions. With a rotting hold, leaks are profuse, but the bailing pumps are large and they can direct great flows of bilge water back over the sides or into the gaping mouths of the passengers. But what happens to the pumps when the power fails? cheer, jh ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ John Hopkins, Researcher University of Technology Sydney FASS - Centre for Media Arts Innovation http://neoscenes.net/ http://tech-no-mad.net/blog/ http://www.neoscenes.net/travelog/weblog.php jhopkins@neoscenes.net AU Mobile - +61 (0)40 696 4610 US cell - +1 928 308 6466 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mail.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org