James Wallbank on Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:47:33 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> Pirates of the Internets unite/Re: the dawning of internet censorship in germany |
Bravo Miltos! There's another public position which could be taken which might move in the same direction, towards freedom of information and cultural content. How about campaigning to refuse, absolutely, to listen to or view any music, video, or use other data which is not legally copyable and reproducable? This position could lead to huge boycotts of cinema and the record industry, a massive boost for free content creators, and a blossoming of interest in making your own cultural content. In Victorian times every pub in the UK had a piano. People would make their own music. Now, every pub has a jukebox and every kid downloads - listening to professional, corporate music like it's a drug, wallowing in their own cultural passivity. Freedom to download other people's stuff doesn't necessarily lead to more cultural engagement - in fact, it may lead to less! Sure, it may be that "home made" cultural content is less polished (and some people - not me - might argue that it's of lower quality) but the experience of making it, and the critical and creative skills developed by trying to create, are far more important. The process is more significant than the product. Perhaps, now is the time to WELCOME an "anti-piracy clampdown". Bring it on - it's the commercial content industries deciding, finally, to exit the mainstream culture and marginalise themselves! More DRM, more YouTube takedowns, more aggressive threats and prosecutions of music fans are simply the death throes of an industry that exists on the false claim that it owns creativity. While I'm here, I'd like to make an observation about the term "Music Piracy". Pirates are armed criminals, that steal, abduct, threaten and kill. A bedroom downloader isn't a pirate, in the same way that someone who parks outside the marked bay isn't a "Parking Rapist", and someone who puts the wrong postage on a stamp isn't a "Postal Murderer". "Piracy" as a term for petty fee avoidance is an outrageous piece of manipulative Newspeak. For more than ten years now I haven't used any commercial software, and I haven't felt in the least bit tempted to pirate commercial software. Why? Because I've become involved in the richer, more interesting and more empowering world of free software. Maybe now its the time to campaign, not for "Freedom to Pirate" but for "Open Culture": let's abandon all music and film whose creators don't welcome our interest. I'd rather make my own tunes or listen to the birds singing than give any attention to bands who don't want me to listen for free. Best Regards, James ===== Miltos Manetas wrote: > This is the time for the Foundation of an International Pirate Party > like the one the PirateBay brought forward in Sweden and which got 2 > seats at the Europarliament. <...> # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mail.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@kein.org