Sean Wieland on Fri, 29 Jun 2001 14:30:03 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: <nettime> Echelon, privacy and property |
the following is a criticism of a part of a whole, so take it with a grain of salt accordingly: Sean Cubitt wrote: > [snip] > Who wants to retain privacy?. Mainly wife-beaters, child-abusers and > tax-evaders. Most of us have nothing to lose but our privacy -- the > compulsory hoarding of data in the form of private property and private > thoughts. But a private thought is no thought at all, like a poem left > in a drawer is no poem. does this feel to anyone else like part of the "enlightenment" O'Brien puts upon Winston Smith towards the end of Orwell's '1984'? the idea that the will of the party ("ignorance is strength", also not unlike some arguments made by Terry Gilliam in the film '12 Monkies' about sanity), can overcome reality in a (IMHO) perverse way. The law of gravity was nonsense. 'If I wished,' O'Brien had said, 'I could float off this floor like a soap bubble.' Winston worked it out. 'If he thinks he floats off the floor, and if I simultaneously think I see him do it, then the thing happens.' -- George Orwell's '1984', Chapter 3, Section 4 for an individual, "freedom is slavery" does not hold true. just as winston's journal held meaning for him ("Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4. If that is granted, all else follows."), a poem left in a drawer is still a poem -- to the poet. I agree that most data should be globalized, in the sense that known facts and truth about the universe and human invention and insight should be free (as in speech), but (speaking of nihilism) referencing Nietzsche's 'The Anti-Christ', personal privacy must be defended by the individual (the uber-mench?) to prevent humanity from being "ground to dust" -- not unlike the dystopia presented in '1984' ("a boot stamping on a human face -- forever"). Finally, keep in mind that the definition of "private" differs from "secret". What you do in the bathroom isn't secret, but it's private. Per the film 'Sneakers', "No more secrets."; but I'll defend my privacy with everything in my power. that's my $0.02 for the moment. peace, -sean -- +-----=[export-a-crypto-system-sig RSA-3-lines-perl]=-----+ |#!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj| |$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1| |lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/) | +--------=[http://www.cypherspace.org/~adam/rsa/]=--------+ "Most people would rather die than think, and most people do." -- Bertrand Russell # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net