nettime's_digestive_tract on Wed, 27 Jun 2001 09:36:24 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
<nettime> high fiber digest [gray, gurstein] |
Re: <nettime> Only 5% of laid fibre is lit in USA Tom_Gray@Mitel.COM "Michael Gurstein" <mgurst@vcn.bc.ca> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - From: Tom_Gray@Mitel.COM Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 14:34:33 -0400 Subject: Re: <nettime> Only 5% of laid fibre is lit in USA The amount of fibre in the ground will make a significant difference to the manufacturers of fibre and the manufacturers of newer higher rate hardware. Obviously if there is a large amount of unlit fibre, there will be little demand for new fibre and fibre manufacturers will be affected. Additionally if there is existing fibre in the ground than the necessity to purchase newer higher rate transmission equipment is lessened. A new 40Gig system will look very attractive and command premium prices if unlit fibre is scarce. If there is more than adequate unlit fibre then older (possibly second hand) lower rate equipment can be added as needed. Teh effectsd on equipment manufacturers are apparent. Equipment manufacturers will have to have an appropriate set of products to function in this surplus environment which is distinctly different from the fibre shortage environment. In a fibre-surplus environment, management equipment will be of greatest concern to users to allow quick deployment of channels. if the fibre-shortage environment higher speed equipmet will be of greater interest. An unfavorable product focus may be one of the reasons for Nortel's current difficulties. "Michael Gurstein" <mgurst@vcn.bc.ca> on 06/26/2001 12:46:15 PM Please respond to "Michael Gurstein" <mgurst@vcn.bc.ca> To: nettime-l@bbs.thing.net cc: (bcc: Tom Gray/Kan/Mitel) Subject: <nettime> Only 5% of laid fibre is lit in USA <...> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - From: "Michael Gurstein" <mgurst@vcn.bc.ca> Subject: Re: <nettime> Only 5% of laid fibre is lit in USA Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 12:04:12 -0700 Hi Tom, I take your point, but clearly this is of most interest to the companies and investors affected rather than the users/applications developers. Your comments about the need for changes in the technology business strategy for companies like Nortel are are well taken. My argument though, was that from an applications/user perspective (and here in Canada from the perspective of potential government support for the "universal access" recommendations of the National Broadband Task Force http://www.broadband.ic.gc.ca ), the WSJ article was misleading and potentially dangerous as it suggested a lack of interest/usefulness in the available bandwidth, thus implying that there was no need or desire for Broadband connectivity beyond what is currently available (in massively over serviced urban markets). The 5% argument has already been taken up and widely quoted in Canadian papers to support opposition to the proposed proram. The fact that there is redundancy in the supply is at least an artifact of the technology (and the market) and doesn't imply anything about the usefulness or "desireability" of the product. Mike Gurstein mgurst@vcn.bc.ca ----- Original Message ----- From: <Tom_Gray@Mitel.COM> To: "Michael Gurstein" <mgurst@vcn.bc.ca> Cc: <nettime-l@bbs.thing.net> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 11:34 AM Subject: Re: <nettime> Only 5% of laid fibre is lit in USA > From: Tom Gray@MITEL on 06/26/2001 02:34 PM > > The amount of fibre in the ground will make a significant difference to > the manufacturers of fibre and the manufacturers of newer higher rate > hardware. <...> Michael Gurstein & Associates Vancouver BC CANADA (Visiting) Professor of Management New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark, NJ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- End forwarded message ----- # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net