Thomas Temme on Mon, 5 Jun 2000 17:23:30 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
eR: Re: <nettime> NATOsevic |
I do agree in most points with you about the necessity of free media, students rebellion and solidarity. The point I wanted to make is in fact somehow a justification of Yugoslavian government, in a way that I tried to make the NATO partly responsible for ongoing oppression. I do think that Milosevic is the leader of a regime that has to be overcome, the sooner the better. But I also believe that a lot of what happened in the Balkan in the last decade was purely the NATO trying to get control over, not peace for a region in Europe. The war that I meant Yugoslavia still to be involved in is this aggression from outside and a partly stimulated rebellion from inside. Again, my believe is that Milosevic has to be overcome, and I do not think that the rebelling people in Yugoslavia are just under control of the NATO, unable to see their government in the right light. In my view, Milosevic and also the Serbian population, in western media until recently, were forced into the role of the bad guy systematically, even though this role probably suits Milosevic better than any other famous politician right now. The Rambuillet(?)-contracts that were offered to him before the war are a good example. Should be found somewhere in the net, I am sure. These contracts were a joke because no politician, dictator or not, would just give up the souverignity over his state as it was demanded in these contracts. Milosevic is not just a dictator but he also refused to cooperate with the good guys, the NATO. Which leads to what my fear is: Milosevic will be overcome in the next years and his regime will not leave a vacuum of power which could be filled by the people, discussing freely by which means they want to be governed and how the economy should be organized, but he will be followed by a democratic and NATOcratic or western-liberalistocratic regime. Without any discussion, free market and free trade-exchange will be installed for the sake and the fortune of the Northern-European states. My wish is that not only the regime-in-work should be discussed or fought against but also the regime-to-come. The background on which Milosevic and his government are measured against is not a white sheet of paper (URL about:blank) or true freedom but Northern-European capitalistic democracy. And because the latter system tries for its economic and ideologic profit to crash the order of the Yugoslavian state, I want anybody who is against Milosevic and his gang and is critical about the keeper of the sacred North-Western ideology to speak out loud the BUT in his solidarity with the rebellion in Yugoslavia. I am against Milosevis BUT I don't want him to be overthrown just for the sake of free markets in the Northern-style. I just don't want anybody who shares my view or scepticism to forget the BUT, because it is not all freedom that brightens the Yugoslavian horizon, it might also be some electric light made by gigantic companies in their nuclear power stations seeking for new and uncritical customers. (Ideally, such a rebellion as in Yugoslavia right now could be the best opportunity to discuss the idea of a state as a whole.) My last point is reffering to you: ---- Original Message ----- From: Jim Andrews <jim@vispo.com> To: Thomas Temme <tomtem@gmx.de> > The universities have been shut down by the government and a law has been > put into place that forbids 'political activity' on campuses. This would > seem to be a move to quell the student protests. In Germany we have a new law in work that forbids political activity by the students representatives at the universities. They are only allowed to work in matters directly related with studying, whatever that might be. In my university, there was always work done by the students representatives for immigrants and against nuclear power stations and the transport of nuclear waste through the country, the so-called Castor-Transports. They had to pay high fees (about 100,000 dollars) for keeping on doing so. But not a lot of students complain, because they are necessarily too busy making themselves profitable to be interested in the circumstances they live in. I hope I made myself more clear, and please excuse the looong and for that reason hardly readable sentences, I am German and can't help it. Thanks for your reply, Jim. Thomas # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: majordomo@bbs.thing.net and "info nettime-l" in the msg body # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net