| "Jürgen A. Erhard" on Thu, 20 Sep 2001 13:27:42 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| [Nettime-bold] Re: <nettime> U.K. Anti-Terrorism Law Imperils Hackers, Privacy |
>>>>> "Harsh" == Harsh Kapoor <aiindex@mnet.fr> writes:
Just read this... after watching the news and hearing that George
W. is "patient" (me thinks: "Yes, because he's waiting for the US
population to be even more malleable... maybe he's waiting for another
terrorist attack."). Then, the next item, that the FBI has
information about a planned next wave of terrorist attacks, presumably
for next weekend. Bingo!
And then I read this...
Harsh> http://www.cluebot.com/article.pl?sid=01/07/28/2336239&mode=nested
Harsh> U.K. Anti-Terrorism Law Imperils Hackers, Privacy
Harsh> posted by cicero on Saturday July 28, @06:34PM
Harsh> from the how-nice-that-hackers-are-covered-too dept.
Harsh> A U.K. law that took effect this year gives police far-ranging powers
Harsh> to make warrantless arrests, enter buildings without court orders, and
Harsh> punish people for having information that could be useful to
Harsh> terrorists.
Harsh> The measure, called the Terrorism Act of 2000, received royal assent
Harsh> in July 2000. It became law in February 2001.
[snipperoonio...]
Harsh> Americans, be warned. Congress is spending more and more time talking
Harsh> about bio-chem, Internet, and nuclear attacks. Soon you could be
Harsh> facing the same invasions of privacy and property.
Does this strike a chord? For me, it strikes a power chord. (Feel
like writing some hard-core punk song about it... which would still be
to weak for what I feel).
Harsh> "The legislation which gives the authorities extra
Harsh> powers should have to be renewed by parliament
Harsh> regularly rather than being permanent legislation. The
Harsh> definition of terrorism is also far too wide, in spite
Harsh> of significant efforts by Liberal Democrats and others
Harsh> in parliament to improve it," Simon Hughes, Liberal
Harsh> Democrat Shadow Home Secretary, said in a
Harsh> statement.
Hey, at least some people are still rational... unfortunately, they
are a minority.
Honest, I fear for the future (I'm reminded of "Give me Liberty" by
Frank Miller... in a bad, a very bad way)
Bye, J
PS: I'm still thinking this through... a long posting might be
forthcoming. One that a lot of people probably won't like (like the
U.S. administration).
--
Jürgen A. Erhard (juergen.erhard@gmx.net, jae@users.sf.net)
MARS: http://members.tripod.com/Juergen_Erhard/mars_index.html
Give a man fire and he will be warm for a day.
Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life.