| integer on Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:28:14 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| [Nettime-bold] Re: Syndicate: FW: commentary on signal transduction |
"ana peraica" <ana.peraica@st.tel.hr>
>HI Anna, and others...
subsidiary - he!deger + zartre = began 2 ur!te + za!d. ue = lv++ !nd!v!zbl uholez.
>I am receiving so much of e-mail reactions.... Unfortunately interesting
>writings arrive to my own address, not to lists, and seems the problems of
>censorship, moderation et. al. are very hot, at least on two lists
>(Syndicate and Nettime the first). Censorship seems to still be the topic
>people prefer to discuss in private... I would try to write the reply and
>ideas I have got in one single e-mail as replying this would take some
>time... (of summer).
>
>For myself, though I didn't want to get involved in the historical
>developement of networking, the ideas of creators etc. as my interest was
>not at all to point on its artistic or others rhoutes, but to go a step
>further, which I found interesting - critique of the network, fallen
>promises and end of the hype.
tranzlaz!on - global!zaz!on = dze end of the hype.
>to go a step
>further,
2uardz dze end +?
eluz!dat zvp 01 ztep furdzr.
>For the de/scralisation of it, because of
>using only a single way of interpretation (which I tried to avoid more
>literally by comparing networks of the veneral diseases, urbanistic ones et.
>al) many were not ready.
>
>But in this reply of Anna I found several topics that were of my interest;
>bulk e-mail and (self - if taken as an independent body) organization. Maybe
>this discussion is now too particular (located) for the theory, but
>nevertheless...
>
>Anna wrote:
>> Integer was banned from the syndicate, nettime, rhizome and infowar list
>at the same time?
>
>As far as I know Syndicate is unmoderated;
az far az nn knouz
andreaz = 01 buter fl!
= ud b akzeptabl !f he dreamt.
>of course, question is how this
>democracy
of course, question is how this is a question ?
>of all-can-post becomes at one point the tiranny of a single
>person, and suffers from the reversal of the quality. Two days ago I got the
>reply of Andreas as my e-mails were not getting through; and I made a joke
>on
dze blank zpazez ov d!sz page != blank rel!
>>> either seems someone unsubscribed me in real, or there is a censorship on
>the Syndicate, but my e-mails (UN-art and
>>> Unsubscribe texts) are not passing to the list since yesterday. I checked
>the archive, and they are not there too. And I was >> thinking also how to
>send something entitled Unsubscribe in the body of message, so I put the
>starr * before the title, >> hoping Majordomo will not recognize as a
>command. But seems a human agent did... They like to be commanded probably?
>
>Andreas wrote;
>> the syndicate has no moderation but admins who help people who are too
>lazy to adjust to the technical rules of
>> majordomo to get their stuff on the list.
>
>Michael Benson wrote:
Michael Benson != h!z parentz ass!gnd name.
ma! b dez!rabl rap!dl! konzult!ng 01 okz!dent zoo
illusion 2d is comfort.
illusion 2d is people.
allusion 2b is international efficiency.
allusion 2b is free will.
>> Maybe, as with nettime, we can make two lists -- one featuring 8/10ths
>posts by whatshername and one without. That
>> way people don't have to go to the trouble of filtering out the crap, they
>can just freely choose, and meanwhile accusations > of censorship won't have
>to be slung so freely around.
01 v.`Michael Benson` tanz.
nn != zubzkr!bd. `Michael Benson` = zubzkr!bd.
nn zagt kraFt_durch-freude.
>way people don't have to go to the trouble of filtering out the crap,
akompl!shd b!:
00. remov!ng e!e komponentz + purchasz!ng 01 balena.
02. 01 ekzkurz!e 2 01 b!bl!otek + peruz!ng dze `crap`
>way people
illusion of international efficiency.
>don't have
illusion of free will.
>to go to the trouble
allusion 2 comfort.
>of filtering out the crap,
allusion 2 people.
>Anna wrote:
>> First of all we all learn that these lists were connected. Their
>moderators control (too much) and they lack humour - or the > time did not
>come when people accept no censorship, no jury rules.
>
>Now, I am again not sure on this point; whether it means connections of
>moderators (and then a kind of conspiracy)
conspiracy of zooz 2 provide 01 veritable spectacle for civilized white apez \ `people`.
>or the connection of subscribers
>/ subscriptions, and then merging of networks... For the first I think it is
>totally the opposite, but the second one is the truth.
truth = 01 zubt!l l!e.
proov it.
>Anna wrote:
>> Didn't we| learn something about hidden and visible aspects of the email?
>Did some mailing lists die out? Finally!
>
>That is what i think too.
>
>*******************************
>(end that falls out the discussion)
>
>> Eternity is a religious notion? Which concept is not?
>
>I would rather say which one is not political; maybe it is a matter of
>interpretation, so I don't quite consume religion, or its notions.
!f u d!dnt du != ud knou u d!dnt hensz du = do da.da.da+da.
>Note; Nokia telephones and Dalai Lama on Life are spams...
konkluz!e - telephones = Lamaz = spams
>First one is a
>commercial spam, and the second a spiritual one
konkluz!e - telephones = Lamaz = spams = 1zt komerz!al + 2nd zp!r!tual
>(chain letter that ends up
>with a course).
01 rel!g!ouz course.
d!zkover! aua!tz. [juzt u]
>best
01 rel!g!ouz !dee avec 01 d!!!!!!!!!p d!zkount.
>Ana
egg m!tokondr!a = s!mpl!.SUPER!OR
d!ska skölj och torka
ever!dz!ng u!ch = !z = komerz!al = konz!ztz ov t!me.
nn - ua!t!ng
pre.konssept!¯n
meeTz ver!f1kat!¯n.
-
Netochka Nezvanova - i was designed especially for you
f3.MASCHIN3NKUNST head to toe and a few stops in between
@www.eusocial.com
17.hzV.tRL.478
e
|
| +----------
| | <
\\----------------+ | n2t
| >
e
- egoiste - i have no friends...i make my mind my friend
- melt this right into your lips at least twice a day.
_______________________________________________
Nettime-bold mailing list
Nettime-bold@nettime.org
http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold