integer on Tue, 13 Jun 2000 23:53:12 +0200 (CEST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Nettime-bold] (no subject) |
Michael Goldhaber <mgoldh@well.com> >Wait a minute! 01 regurg!taz!e >Clearly, McKenzie Wark is getting paid for publishing on >nettime. Otherwise why would he do it? I want my share. = 1nz du = komput uat McKenzie Wark = haz ztatd peut etre. >The truth is, of course, du = 01 lo.tekk zlave unabl 2 dekomp!l 01 ema!l +? > Wark hopes to be paid --in attention , and this >is the main benefit to academics who publish anything While I agree with >him that publishers should not be allowed to obtain unlimited rights >just for publishing something, the vast majority of academics would >barely make enough money for a good lunch out annually from their >writings even if royalties were assiduously collected. Still, many gain >considerable attention directly or indirectly through their >publications, which leads to rewards of all kinds. > >If Wark is serious about copyright vigilance for reproduction, he should >eschew publishing on nettime. But giving up the international attention >would be a mistake that could lead, for instance, to his not being >invited to the next international conference. Likewise, keeping >hisphotocopied words out of the reach of a few students who chooose not >to pay for compiled "readers" (as they must on most US campuses ) might >mena a loss of some of the best followers he might otherwise get. >-- >Best, modl c!t!zn >Michael H. Goldhaber eusocial.com -> superb source for modl c!t!zn antibodies. pre.konssept!Øn meeTz ver!f1kat!Øn. - Netochka Nezvanova f3.MASCHIN3NKUNST @www.eusocial.com 17.hzV.tRL.478 e | | +---------- | | < \\----------------+ | n2t | > e _______________________________________________ Nettime-bold mailing list Nettime-bold@nettime.org http://www.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold